Former President Donald Trump announced at a rally in Las Vegas his intention, if re-elected, to eliminate federal taxes on tipped wages. This move, he stated, would apply to workers in industries such as hotels and restaurants who rely on tips as part of their income.
Trump, who made this announcement at his first rally since being convicted on multiple felony charges, emphasized that taxing tips has long been a contentious issue and that workers in tipping jobs deserve a break. He pledged to implement this change immediately upon taking office, asserting that workers in these roles would no longer be pursued for taxes on their tips.
The specifics of Trump’s proposed policy changes were not detailed during his announcement. However, he expressed a commitment to ensuring that workers in restaurants and similar establishments would no longer be taxed on their tips, a move he believes is well-deserved by these workers.
The issue of taxing tips is significant, with the IRS estimating that it loses approximately 45% of owed taxes on tips each year due to inaccurate reporting. While the IRS typically receives 99% of what it’s owed on regular wages, it only collects around 55% of owed taxes on tips.
Las Vegas, the location of Trump’s announcement, relies heavily on tourism and has a large number of service workers who depend on tips for their income. The city’s leisure and hospitality industry is a major employer, representing 26% of total employment as of January 2023.
Despite Trump’s assertion that the idea of eliminating taxes on tips is unprecedented, former Rep. Ron Paul previously proposed a similar plan in 2012. Paul, a Libertarian from Texas who ran for the Republican Party’s presidential nomination that year, advocated for ending federal taxation of tips and argued that tipped workers are overtaxed.
In conclusion, Trump’s proposal to eliminate taxes on tipped wages, if implemented, could have significant implications for workers in industries reliant on tips, particularly in cities like Las Vegas. However, the specific details and potential impacts of this policy change remain unclear.
Leave a comment